A boardroom review gives the table to evaluate their performance in a comprehensive manner. It assists tables in identifying weaknesses in their leadership relationships and the culture they operate in as well as other aspects of longevity. It is also a way to ensure that those who pay to join tables are adequately equipped to fulfill their responsibilities.
This research area is still developing, and a number of issues remain. The first is that the evidence available today has mixed results regarding how dissent affects boards and their functioning. Some studies provide positive (Zona 2016,) curvilinear, not significant, or mixed results. Other studies find negative (Brown Buchholtz And Butts 2019, Heemskerk Heemskerk and Wats, Minichilli, et al. There are 2012) relationships between dissent and task performance of a board.
The literature is not able to provide an in-depth understanding of what factors influence the dynamics of dissension. Future research should create a more integrated theoretical approach to understand this phenomenon of governance. This could include the use techniques that use configuration (Federo and Saz-Carranza (2018); Schiell, Lewellyn & Yan 2023) to help researchers better understand the ways in which board attributes and processes are related to necessary and sufficient causality.
Some studies use an esoteric definition of discord, but don’t provide precise measurement methods. This means that these studies are prone to measurement errors. Thus, it would be beneficial to continue studies to develop more robust and precise dissent measurement techniques.